Plaintiffs' response deadline

Plaintiffs' response deadline

Plaintiffs' response deadline

News & Insights

Feb 14, 2025

2/14/25

4 Min Read

As previously discussed, the Trump administration has taken decisive steps to defend and implement the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), marking a clear path forward for beneficial ownership reporting requirements.

As previously discussed, the Trump administration has taken decisive steps to defend and implement the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), marking a clear path forward for beneficial ownership reporting requirements.

As previously discussed, the Trump administration has taken decisive steps to defend and implement the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), marking a clear path forward for beneficial ownership reporting requirements.

As previously discussed, the Trump administration has taken decisive steps to defend and implement the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), marking a clear path forward for beneficial ownership reporting requirements.

Timeline Developments

Trump Administration's Key Actions

  • February 5, 2025: Filed notice of appeal and motion to stay in Smith case

  • February 7, 2025: Filed brief supporting CTA's constitutionality in Texas Top Cop Shop

  • Signaled flexibility on implementation timeline and requirements

Current Timeline

  • February 14, 2025: Deadline for plaintiffs' response in Smith case

  • April 1, 2025: Oral arguments scheduled in Texas Top Cop Shop (Fifth Circuit)

  • Expected: 30-day compliance window if stay is granted

Why CTA Implementation Looks Likely

Several factors suggest the CTA will move forward:

  1. Supreme Court's 8-1 decision lifting the first injunction

  2. Trump administration's active defense of the law

  3. Treasury's commitment to flexible implementation

  4. Bipartisan support for anti-money laundering measures

Treasury's Implementation Approach

The administration has outlined a nuanced approach to implementation:

  • Initial 30-day extension when reporting resumes

  • Focus on high-risk entities first

  • Potential relief for lower-risk businesses

  • Possible amendments to the Final Rule

What This Means for Businesses

Short-Term Considerations

  • Expect reporting requirements to resume soon

  • Initial 30-day compliance window

  • Potential prioritization based on risk level

Long-Term Outlook

  • Likely extensions through end of 2025

  • Modified requirements for different risk categories

  • Continued refinement of reporting rules

Bridge to BOI's Analysis

The Trump administration's defense of the CTA, combined with the Supreme Court's earlier ruling, suggests we're moving toward implementation rather than repeal. While timelines and specific requirements may evolve, the core reporting obligations appear likely to remain.

Looking Forward

We anticipate:

  • Resolution of the Smith injunction soon

  • Clearer implementation timelines

  • Risk-based compliance approach

  • Extended deadlines for full compliance

As previously discussed, the Trump administration has taken decisive steps to defend and implement the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), marking a clear path forward for beneficial ownership reporting requirements.

Timeline Developments

Trump Administration's Key Actions

  • February 5, 2025: Filed notice of appeal and motion to stay in Smith case

  • February 7, 2025: Filed brief supporting CTA's constitutionality in Texas Top Cop Shop

  • Signaled flexibility on implementation timeline and requirements

Current Timeline

  • February 14, 2025: Deadline for plaintiffs' response in Smith case

  • April 1, 2025: Oral arguments scheduled in Texas Top Cop Shop (Fifth Circuit)

  • Expected: 30-day compliance window if stay is granted

Why CTA Implementation Looks Likely

Several factors suggest the CTA will move forward:

  1. Supreme Court's 8-1 decision lifting the first injunction

  2. Trump administration's active defense of the law

  3. Treasury's commitment to flexible implementation

  4. Bipartisan support for anti-money laundering measures

Treasury's Implementation Approach

The administration has outlined a nuanced approach to implementation:

  • Initial 30-day extension when reporting resumes

  • Focus on high-risk entities first

  • Potential relief for lower-risk businesses

  • Possible amendments to the Final Rule

What This Means for Businesses

Short-Term Considerations

  • Expect reporting requirements to resume soon

  • Initial 30-day compliance window

  • Potential prioritization based on risk level

Long-Term Outlook

  • Likely extensions through end of 2025

  • Modified requirements for different risk categories

  • Continued refinement of reporting rules

Bridge to BOI's Analysis

The Trump administration's defense of the CTA, combined with the Supreme Court's earlier ruling, suggests we're moving toward implementation rather than repeal. While timelines and specific requirements may evolve, the core reporting obligations appear likely to remain.

Looking Forward

We anticipate:

  • Resolution of the Smith injunction soon

  • Clearer implementation timelines

  • Risk-based compliance approach

  • Extended deadlines for full compliance

As previously discussed, the Trump administration has taken decisive steps to defend and implement the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), marking a clear path forward for beneficial ownership reporting requirements.

Timeline Developments

Trump Administration's Key Actions

  • February 5, 2025: Filed notice of appeal and motion to stay in Smith case

  • February 7, 2025: Filed brief supporting CTA's constitutionality in Texas Top Cop Shop

  • Signaled flexibility on implementation timeline and requirements

Current Timeline

  • February 14, 2025: Deadline for plaintiffs' response in Smith case

  • April 1, 2025: Oral arguments scheduled in Texas Top Cop Shop (Fifth Circuit)

  • Expected: 30-day compliance window if stay is granted

Why CTA Implementation Looks Likely

Several factors suggest the CTA will move forward:

  1. Supreme Court's 8-1 decision lifting the first injunction

  2. Trump administration's active defense of the law

  3. Treasury's commitment to flexible implementation

  4. Bipartisan support for anti-money laundering measures

Treasury's Implementation Approach

The administration has outlined a nuanced approach to implementation:

  • Initial 30-day extension when reporting resumes

  • Focus on high-risk entities first

  • Potential relief for lower-risk businesses

  • Possible amendments to the Final Rule

What This Means for Businesses

Short-Term Considerations

  • Expect reporting requirements to resume soon

  • Initial 30-day compliance window

  • Potential prioritization based on risk level

Long-Term Outlook

  • Likely extensions through end of 2025

  • Modified requirements for different risk categories

  • Continued refinement of reporting rules

Bridge to BOI's Analysis

The Trump administration's defense of the CTA, combined with the Supreme Court's earlier ruling, suggests we're moving toward implementation rather than repeal. While timelines and specific requirements may evolve, the core reporting obligations appear likely to remain.

Looking Forward

We anticipate:

  • Resolution of the Smith injunction soon

  • Clearer implementation timelines

  • Risk-based compliance approach

  • Extended deadlines for full compliance

Join our newsletter list

Sign up to get the most recent blog articles in your email every week.

Check Our Substack